Looking for a simpler Bitly alternative?

Short links, a branded domain, QR codes, campaigns and real analytics, without the jump from a small-business plan to an enterprise one. The Free plan uses a verified account.

Verify a free account to keep permanent links and manage them.

The honest comparison

Bitly figures below are from Bitly's published pricing page, checked on 13 September 2026. Plans change; check theirs before deciding. ashrt.link figures are the limits our own API enforces, listed on our pricing page.

Free planBitly Freeashrt.link Free
New links5 per month10 per 30 days
QR codes2 per monthOne for every link, 10 downloads a month
Click historyNot included30 days
Referrers, countries, devicesNot on freeIncluded
Email verificationAccount requiredRequired for the Free plan
APINot on free25 calls a day
PaidBitlyashrt.link
First paid tierCore, $10/mo billed annually, 100 links a monthPro, $9/mo, 250 links per 30 days
A branded domain arrives atGrowth, $29/mo annuallyPro, $9/mo
Link expiry arrives atGrowth, $29/mo annuallyPro, $9/mo
Campaign-level reporting arrives atPremium, $199/mo annuallyFree
Click history on the first paid tier30 days400 days
Top tier before enterprisePremium, $199/mo annually, 3,000 links a monthBusiness, $29/mo, 2,500 links per 30 days

Where we are genuinely different

The allowance is on creating links, not on keeping them

A monthly link cap that also counts everything you made last year eventually forces you to delete old links to publish new ones, and a deleted short link is a dead link on whatever it was printed on. Here the count is of links created in the last 30 days. Everything you have already published keeps working and stops counting once its window passes.

Analytics are not the upsell

Referrers, countries, devices, browsers, operating systems, time of day, day of week, campaign totals and CSV export are on the free plan. The paid plans sell a domain, QR design, link expiry and volume. We would rather charge for capacity than for the numbers that tell you whether any of it worked.

Bot traffic is named, not counted

Slack, X, Facebook, Discord and iMessage all fetch a link the moment you post it, to build the preview. Counting those as clicks makes every link look like it did better than it did. They are classified by service, kept in their own panel, and excluded from your click total, so the number you report to somebody else is defensible.

Nothing sits between the click and the destination

No interstitial page, no advert, no "you are being redirected". One 302 to where the link says it goes. The only exception is a link we have flagged for review, which shows a warning instead of forwarding, and that is a safety measure rather than a monetisation.

You can change where a link points, and undo it

Destinations stay editable, the last ten are kept with the date and who changed them, and any of them can be restored. Before you change a link, the editor tells you how many clicks it has had in the last 30 days, because that is the number that makes it a decision rather than a form field.

Where Bitly is the better choice

Being straight about this is more useful than pretending otherwise. Bitly has been around far longer, and their scale shows in places we do not compete: SSO and group permissions, a dedicated success manager, mobile deep linking, city-level geography, a much larger integration catalogue, and the simple fact that bit.ly is a link people recognise. If you need enterprise access control or deep linking into native apps, buy the thing that has them.

We are built for the person or small team who wants branded, trackable links and honest numbers without a four-figure annual commitment.

Moving over

Existing Bitly links keep working; nothing here breaks them, and there is no need to migrate history. The usual approach is to point a new subdomain, something like go.yourbrand.com, at ashrt.link, start making new links here, and leave the old ones alone. Setup is a TXT record and a CNAME, and the domain screen tells you which of the checks is still outstanding rather than saying "pending".